“因果链”的表达策略与类型(8)
http://www.newdu.com 2024/11/25 04:11:59 《当代语言学》 沈力 参加讨论
参考文献： [1]Croft,W.1991.Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations:The Cognitive Organization of Information.Chicago,IL:University of Chicago Press. [2]Dowty,D.1979.Word Meaning and Montague Grammar.Dordrecht:Reidel. [3]Furuya,A.(古屋昭弘).1985.The verb resnitative construction “V+jiao+(O)+C” in Song Dynasty.Studies of Chinese Literature 11,40-57.[1985，宋代の動補構造“V教(O)C”について。早稻田大学中国文学会，《中国文学研究》11,40-57。] [4]——.2005.Causative construction Vt+ling+Vi found in Qimin Yaoshu.In Zhu Q.,ed.,Studies on Middle Chinese,Ⅱ.Beijing:Commercial Press.[2005，《齐民要术》中所见的使成式Vt+令+Vi。见朱庆之编，《中古汉语研究(二)》。北京：商务印书馆。Pp.235-57。] [5]Goldberg,A.1995.Constructions:A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure.Chicago,IL:University of Chicago Press. [6]Hoekstra,T.1988.Small clause results.Lingua 74,2-3:102-39. [7]Jackendoff,R.1990.Semantic Structures.Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press. [8]Kageyama,T.(影山太郎).1996.On the Meanings of Verbs Tokyo:Kureshio Press.[1996，《動詞意味論》。東京：くろお出版。] [9]Kindaichi,H.(金田—春彦).1950.The classification of Japanese verbs.Studies on Speech 15,48-63.[1950，国語動詞の一分類。《言語研究》15,48-63。] [10]Langacker,R.W.1991.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,Vol.2:Descriptive Application.Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press. [11]Levin,B.and M.Rappaport Hovav.1995.Unaccusativity.Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press. [12]Li,J.(李劲荣).2007.A functional analysis of sentences with object-oriented adverbial.Studies on the Chinese Language 4:331-42.[2007，指宾状语句的功能透视。《中国语文》第4期,331-42页。] [13]Lu,J.(卢建).2003.An analysis on the syntactic realization and function of Chinese depietive adverbial modifiers.Studies in Language and Linguistics 1:99-106.[2003，可换位摹物状语的句位实现及功能分析。《语言研究》第1期。Pp.99-106页。] [14]Simpson,J.1983.Resultatives.In L.Levin,M.Rappaport Hovav,and A.Zaenen,eds.,Lexical Functional Grammar.Indiana University Linguistics Club.Pp.143-517. [15]Shen,L.(沈力).2013.A comparative study on the resultative compounds in Japanese and Chinese.In T.Kageyama,ed.,The Forefront of V-V Compounds:Investigation into Mystery.Pp.375-411.[2013，結果複合動詞に関すゐ日中对照研究。见影山太郎编，《複合動詞研究の最前線—謎の解明にむけて》。東京：ひつじ書房。Pp.375-411。] [16]Shen,L.(沈力)and T.-H.Lin(林宗宏).2003.Transitivity harmony and head-finality of resultative verbal compounds in Chinese.The Proceedings of GLOW in Asia 3.Pp.369-82. [17]——.2009.Resuhative construction and event structure in Chinese.In Shen L.and Zhao H.,eds.,Studies in Chinese and Japanese Theoretical Linguistics.Beijing:Xueyuan Publishing House.Pp.197-209.[2009，中国語の結果構文と事象構造。见沈力、赵华敏主编，《汉日理论言语学研究》。北京：学苑出版社。Pp.197-209页。] [18]Uehara and Kingkarn.2009.Resultative construction in Thai.In N.Ono,ed.,The Typology of Resultative Construction.Tokyo:Hitsuji Press.Pp.365-406.[2009，イ語におけゐ結果構文。见小野尚之编，《結果構文のタイポロジ一》。東京：ひつじ書房。Pp.365-406页。] [19]Washio,R.1997.Resultatives,compositionality and language variation.Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6,1:1-49. [20]Vendler,Z.1967.Linguistics in Philosophy.Ithaca,NY:Cornell University Press. (责任编辑：admin) |
- 上一篇：构式语法理论解读下的英语新闻标题
- 下一篇：认知视角下英语语法隐喻的功能研究